Did you like the article? Share it

MP 1.171/2023: radical change to tax investments abroad

Understand the taxation of income abroad proposed by the Federal Government for the taxation of financial investments abroad by those who are tax residents in Brazil, including offshore companies.

Yesterday, April 30, 2023, the Federal Government published the Provisional Measure no. 1.171/2023which took the market by surprise. With the clear aim of "taxing investments abroad" in order to increase revenue to compensate for the new income tax exemption band, this Provisional Measure established that, from January 1st, 2024For the purposes of this article, individuals who are tax residents in Brazil will be subject to income tax on income earned from financial investments, profits and dividends from controlled entities and assets and rights subject to trust abroad.

A the federal government's justification for the measure is to follow the recommendation of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Although there are jurisdictions that have rules of this type, it is clearly a new way of taxing investments abroad without a thorough assessment of how taxation should be carried out. We have already mentioned how investments abroad have today, in Brazil, a taxation of earnings and income abroad problematic.

What has been planned to tax investments abroad

Both income earned from financial investments such as those from foreign subsidiaries and respective capital gains will now be taxed separately from other income and gains in the income tax return. If Provisional Measure No. 1.171/2023 is converted into law as it stands, these incomes and gains will be subject to progressive taxation of:

  • 0% for annual incomes of less than R$6,000.00;
  • 15% for the portion of income above R$6,000.00 and below R$50,000.00; and
  • 22,5% for income exceeding R$ 50,000.00.

In the case of financial investments abroad, taxation will take place when they are made available to the individual, i.e. when they are redeemed, amortized, sold, mature or liquidated.

In the case of controlled entities based in "tax haven" or subject to a privileged tax regime or that have a majority of passive income (e.g. the private investment companies), profits generated as of January 1, 2024 will be taxed at the end of each year based on the foreign subsidiary's annual balance sheet, and losses calculated after the effective date of this provisional measure and prior to the respective calculation of profits may be deducted. Profits and dividends from investee companies domiciled in Brazil may also be deducted.

It should be noted that the accumulated profits up to December 31, 2023, calculated according to the financial statements of off-shorewill only be taxed at the new rates when they are actually made available to the controlling individual.

This provisional measure, in the terms proposed yesterday, unfortunately, ends the benefit of the tax deferral granted to offshore structures for financial investments (as private investment companies), through which the profits earned by these offshore entities would only be taxed when they are effectively made available to the controlling Brazilian tax resident individual, making it possible to optimize the reinvestment of profits in the structure itself.

MP 1.171/2023: other relevant issues

taxar-investimentos-no-exterior

Using "tax havens" for investments abroad could become less advantageous

Option to update investments to market value paying 10% tax

On the other hand, this provisional measure opened up the possibility of updating the market value of assets and rights held abroad (such as financial investments, real estate, vehicles, aircraft, vessels and holdings in controlled entities), by paying 10% on the capital gain (difference between the acquisition cost in the DIRPF and the market value on December 31, 2022), if the payment is made by November 30, 2023. For holdings in controlled entities, it would be possible to restate the value to market value on December 31, 2023 by paying IRPF 10% on the difference.

Revocation of 2 important exemptions

In addition, this provisional measure also repeals two exemptions that currently exist in relation to assets held abroad. The first is the exemption on exchange variation on investments abroad that originate in foreign currency. Revoking this exemption has an impact on taxing investments abroad, especially those who have earned income from working abroad and want to keep it protected from the devaluation of the real against the dollar and other currencies.

The second is the IRPF exemption on capital gain on the sale of assets acquired as a non-residentThis had already been proposed in Bill 2.337/2021 and was not approved by the Chamber of Deputies. Revoking this exemption greatly affects those who have built up assets abroad as non-residents and wish to transition to tax resident status in Brazil.

Taxation of trusts and private foundations abroad

It is also worth mentioning that this provisional measure establishes, for the first time, the taxation of trusts and private foundations offshoreincluding establishing that the distributions of the trust to the beneficiaries has the nature of a gratuitous transfer, consisting of a donation, if it occurred during the lifetime of the settlor of the trust (settlor) or transmission cause of deathif after his death.

Taxing investments abroad: a few comments

As the conversion of Provisional Measure No. 1.171/2023 into law depends on the approval of the National Congress, the content of this provisional measure may still be modified during its passage through Congress. In addition, under the terms of Article 62 of the Federal Constitution, provisional measures are effective for 60 days, extendable for a further 60 days only once, and must be considered within this period by Congress for conversion into law or rejection.

This is not the first time that the Federal Government has tried to tax income earned by individuals from controlled entities offshoreThe following can be cited Bill no. 2.337/2021 (nicknamed Income tax reform), o Bill no. 3.489/2021, a Provisional Measure no. 627/2013But none of them has had enough support to move forward in Congress so far. It is not yet certain, therefore, that this initiative to tax investments abroad will succeed.

Regardless, in addition to following the progress of this Provisional Measure in Congress, we will be analyzing the issue in greater detail over the next few days to see if there are any loopholes or interpretative biases that could be used in the taxpayer's favor.

We are at your disposal for further information.

On this blog you will always find relevant, up-to-date information on the subject and guidance on how to avoid problems with the tax authorities and other authorities. Feel free to tell us about your experience, share the content with other friends who need guidance and contact us by e-mail at contato@tersi.adv.br or via WhatsAppClick here to send a message now.

Count me in!

References:

Author

  • Vinicius Tersi

    Vinicius Tersi is a lawyer and specialist in international tax law. He also has a degree in Accounting and a Master's in Tax Law from USP, and is familiar with different legal and accounting systems. He specializes in international transactions for entrepreneurs and families with tax residency and assets in multiple jurisdictions. He is qualified to act in Brazil and Portugal.

Comments

Home Forums MP 1.171/2023: radical change to tax investments abroad

  • Este tópico contém 10 respostas, 9 vozes e foi atualizado pela última vez 12 meses ago por Nelice.
Visualizando 10 respostas da discussão
  • Autor
    Posts
    • #6658
      Vinicius Tersi
      Keymaster
      0
      ::

      Understand the taxation of income abroad proposed by the Federal Government for the taxation of financial investments abroad by those who are tax residents in Brazil, including offshore companies.

      [See the full article at MP 1.171/2023: radical change to tax investments abroad]

    • #6693
      Roberto
      Participant
      0
      ::

      Tersi, for those who are not resident in Brazil, but declare income tax both in Brazil and in their current country of residence, would the greatest impact be the repeal of the exemption on capital gains? For example, if I own a home abroad, which until then was only declared for Brazilian income tax, when I sell it for a profit, am I obliged to pay tax in Brazil from now on?

    • #6694
      Vinicius Tersi
      Keymaster
      0
      ::

      Roberto,

      thanks for your question. This exemption applies in a very specific situation: the person made a permanent departure (or was never a tax resident in Brazil), acquired an asset abroad and was only able to sell the asset after becoming a tax resident in Brazil. This is a useful exemption for those making the transition, for example, because they bought a property abroad and were unable to sell it before returning to Brazil, or have an investment portfolio abroad formed while they were not resident. If the exemption is revoked, income tax will be due in Brazil on the capital gain, regardless of the circumstances in which the asset was acquired abroad.

      It's not very clear from your description whether this would be your case or not. In Brazil, anyone who files an income tax return every year is always considered a resident. Unlike other countries, in Brazil we don't have income tax returns filed by non-residents.

      On this blog you will always find relevant, up-to-date information on the subject and guidance on how to avoid problems with the tax authorities and other authorities. Feel free to tell us about your experience, share the content with other friends who need guidance and contact us by e-mail at contato@tersi.adv.br or via WhatsApp. Click here to send a message now.

      Count me in!

    • #6695
      0
      ::

      Dr. Tersi,
      With regard to investments by individuals abroad, I see that there are different interpretations in the market:
      1) investments in the financial market abroad would only be taxed when the investment is fully or partially redeemed, but there is also the interpretation that the investment would be taxed according to the variation in the final capital of each year.
      2) With regard to real estate, would the tax be levied only on the sale of the property or would it also be levied every year?
      How do you see these points?
      Thank you,
      Fernando

    • #6696
      Michael
      Participant
      0
      ::

      Good afternoon Dr. Vinicius. First of all, congratulations for all the enlightening content on your site.

      What really worries me the most would be the repeal of the exemption on exchange rate fluctuations for investments originally in foreign currency - a radical and substantial change, especially for resident investors who have held this position for hedging reasons for a long time.

      - Would such a measure really have legal validity over the entire cumulative history of the investment? Wouldn't this be a RETROACTIVE measure and therefore unconstitutional? If the revocation of the exemption is somehow maintained in the PM, wouldn't it only have to apply to the exchange rate variation from 01/01/2024 onwards?

      - Is it possible to understand what the MP changes about the "triggers" in the timing of income tax on financial investments or taxable foreign exchange gains after 01/01/2024? To clarify: in the case of a simple appreciation of the dollar during a calendar year, without any disposal, is it possible to know in which situations the investor will be taxed, and in which situations, during a subsequent calendar year in the case of a simple devaluation of the dollar, will it be possible to compensate?

      Thanks for any clarifications!

    • #6697
      Carlos
      Participant
      0
      ::

      What is your opinion on this "Balance Sheet in Reais" for taxation of foreign subsidiaries as of Jan/2024?
      I know of countries that consider subsidiaries that act as investment holding companies to be "pass through" companies and simply disregard the company and tax the assets within it as if they were in the hands of the individual, therefore when receiving income and disposing of assets.
      I've also seen countries that tax that company's profit (IN THE COMPANY'S CURRENCY). If it earned $100,000, that's taxed. But taxing on the difference between "Value in Reais in Dec/2024" and "Value in Reais in Dec/2023" seems to me to be creative accounting in order to always have something to tax. The exchange rate variation of all assets would be taxed, an exaggeration in my opinion. Your opinion?

    • #6698
      Paulo Monteiro
      Participant
      0
      ::

      Good morning Vinicius, first of all congratulations on the clarity and quality of the above text.
      I'd like to ask a question: in the event that I make a permanent tax exit from Brazil, I understand that I can keep real estate and financial assets in Brazil, correct? In the case of real estate, will I still have to pay IPTU, for example? And in the case of financial assets, the tax should be levied at source through the agent / representative I appoint in Brazil, correct?
      In this case, when it comes to a future inventory, I understand that I won't be subject to the rules and laws of Brazil, but of the country where I will have my tax residence (in this case, Italy), correct?
      Thank you in advance for your clarification. Paulo.

    • #6699
      Marcus
      Participant
      0
      ::

      Tersi, what would be the situation with the exemption for capital gains abroad of up to 35,000 reais per month, which will start with the new rule in January 2024?

    • #6700
      Marcus
      Participant
      0
      ::

      Tersi, in the non-taxation agreements between Brazil and other countries such as China, I understand that we can be absent from Brazil for more than a year and continue to do income tax normally here. Is that correct?
      If the income tax collected in China is 10% , will we have to pay the remaining 17.5% in Brazil to complete the 27.5% or is the agreement independent of the amount of tax paid there?
      We have the example of the United Arab Emirates, which has an agreement with Brazil and there Ir is zero!
      In this case, if we don't give a tax exit, do we end up having to pay 27.5% to go to Brazil and work there?

    • #10211
      Karina
      Participant
      0
      ::

      Hello, Vinícius,
      First of all, thank you very much for all the content on the site.
      I'd like to ask what the new law will mean for non-taxation agreements. Would investments already taxed in Portugal, for example, be taxed in full?
      Will the tax on exchange rate fluctuations also apply to amounts in current accounts?

      Thank you
      Karina

    • #10227
      Nelice
      Participant
      0
      ::

      In this case, the best alternative is for the non-resident to dispose of the assets before returning to the status of resident in Brazil.

Visualizando 10 respostas da discussão
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Reply
1
Hi, I'm Vinicius Tersi, a specialist in international tax law.

I hope that the content of our website is useful and appropriate to your reality.

Didn't find an answer to your question on the site?

Send it to me via WhatsApp so that my team can better understand your case.

It will be a pleasure to meet you!