residente no brasil

Does the individual returns to be a resident in Brazil just because he/she returns to spend a vacation with the family?

Normative Instruction SRF no. 208/2002, in a specific device, informs that, if the person did not formally leave definitively when he/she left the country, he/she will have his/her tax residency in Brazil extended for another 12 months after having physically left Brazilian territory. This situation is called by the legislation “temporary exit”. Thereafter, the person must be treated as a non-resident.

Despite the normative provision, the recognition of the temporary exit is not automatic. The IRS still asks the taxpayer to deliver a definitive exit statement to inform that he ceased to be a tax resident after the period of absence had passed. In other words, in practice, the only difference in terms of compliance with tax obligations between the definitive exit and the temporary exit is the setting of the tax exit date.

This creates a problem in a very common situation: the person who returns to Brazil annually, before completing 12 months, to spend a few days in Brazil to visit family, to do tourism and to spend the end of year festivities. The Individual Income Tax Return Program Help states that if the taxpayer has not completed 12 uninterrupted months of absence, the 12-month period of temporary withdrawal must be restarted. Interpreting this orientation literally means that, just for a few days, the person will never stop being a tax resident in Brazil.

This understanding is incoherent, since it disregards that the element that characterizes the Brazilian’s non-residence is the intention to remain in Brazil, a subjective criterion. If the person has already met this subjective criterion, there are already facts and circumstances in his life that prove his lack of interest in staying in Brazil. This element alone should already be sufficient, even if the formalization of the final exit did not exist.

It is worth noting that the Federal Revenue Service, on one occasion, already presented in this Consultation Solution exactly this understanding, supported by Normative Opinion. It was defined that “it does not characterize a return to vacation travel or other reasons, as it does not have a stable character of permanence in the national territory”.

Thus, although the most conservative is to apply the law literally, it is possible to defend the temporary departure after 12 months, without the time spent only for holidays and tourism restarting that period.

In this blog you will always find relevant and updated information on the subject, in addition to guiding you to avoid problems with the Tax Authorities and other authorities. Feel free to tell us about your experience, share the content with other friends who need guidance and get in touch with us via email contato@tersi.adv.br or via WhatsApp. Click here to send a message now.

Count on me!

A big hug,

Vinicius Tersi

Não seja o último a saber, se inscreva na nossa newsletter.

Não seja surpreendido pela falta de informação.

Vinicius Tersi é advogado, especialista em Direito Tributário Internacional.

  • (61) 99683-8894
  • contato@tersi.adv.br

Elaborado por 3MIND – Especialistas em marketing jurídico

Open chat
1
“Olá sou Vinicius Tersi, especialista em Direito Tributário Internacional.

Espero que o conteúdo de nosso site seja útil e adequado à sua realidade.

Não achou uma resposta para sua dúvida no site?

Envie-a via Whatsapp, para eu e minha equipe conversarmos e entendermos melhor o seu caso.
Powered by